While the source and purpose of music is still a mystery, the theory, first promoted by Charles Darwin, that music is an adaptation for sexual selection is one of the most popular explanations for the phenomenon of music.1 In numerous animal species, Darwin saw that certain sounds are made exclusively during the breeding period and function to attract breeding partners. Like music in humans, production of these sounds can be energetically costly, and birds have even been observed to faint and die from exhaustion during particularly ostentatious singing performances. Darwin reasoned that only if males were certain to impress females would they take the risks to impress them. We study here whether women are more sexually aroused listening music compared with men, given their role in the evolutionary process of sexual selection. Participants are 150 healthy university male and 150 healthy university female volunteers aged 18 to 25 split in 5 groups of each sex who listened to different genre of instrumental music without lyrics. Arousal level data collected by the physiological measurements (penile strain gauge, photoplethysmogram, and wearable biosensors) or by the self-reported questionnaires. The conclusion would be validated for Darwin's hypothesis, if females show a greater arousal level in the case of both genres, otherwise other hypotheses would be taken into account.
Research Article
Open Access