Generative Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Language Learning: Cognitive Mechanisms, Theoretical Tensions, and Ethical Governance

Yiyang Hao

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/2027.NL38595

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) is changing the environment of language learning, but its theoretical basis and ethical boundaries have not been fully explored. This paper builds a multi-level analytical system for AI-assisted language learning based on cognitive load theory, the zone of proximal development, generative linguistics and the technology acceptance model. AI can help students learn better by reducing extraneous cognitive load and providing easy-to-access support and instant correction; however, due to technological limitations, it may also reduce students' sense of ability and self-management. Generative linguistics and generative AI are not in opposition; rather, the former advocates for data frugality and innate mechanisms, while the latter is characterized by data maximalism and statistical learning; they are in harmony at the level of third factors and the Minimalist Program. According to the above research, chatbots have shown a modest positive effect on language learning; this degree varies depending on the learner's level, interface Design, interaction characteristics, etc. Based on the above, this paper introduces a "Smart Chinese" collaborative learning plugin that integrates ChatGPT with special scaffolding tools for assessment, planning, practice, feedback and community support. Finally, it presents the ethical problems of algorithmic bias, data privacy, over-reliance, and educational gaps, and proposes a multi-level governance system at the institutional, technological and pedagogical levels.

Keywords: Generative Artificial Intelligence , Language Learning , Cognitive Load , Technology Acceptance Model , Ethical Governance.

Article Information

Received: 20 September 2026

Published: 3 November 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2027.NL38595

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Hao,Y. (2026). Generative Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Language Learning: Cognitive Mechanisms, Theoretical Tensions, and Ethical Governance. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,159,27-33.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Volume

Volume Title: LNEP Vol.159

Part of Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

ISSN: 2753-7048 (Print) / 2753-7056 (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]Wang, F., Cheung, A. C. K., Neitzel, A. J., & Chai, C. S. (2025). Does chatting with chatbots improve language learning performance? A meta-analysis of chatbot-assisted language learning.Review of Educational Research, 95(4), 623-660.

[2]Albedah, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence in language education: A systematic review of multilingual applications, large language models, and emerging challenges.Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 49, 247–268.

[3]Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning.Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.

[4]Hao, C., Ma, N., Saad, M. R. B. M., Halim, H. B. A., Guo, M., & Hao, M. (2026). How LLM chatbots shape self-regulated language learning: The interplay of cognitive load and basic psychological needs.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 42(1).

[5]Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

[6]Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.

[7]Chomsky, N. (2023, March 8). The false promise of ChatGPT.The New York Times.

[8]On the compatibility of generative AI and generative linguistics. (2025). arXiv:2411.10533. https://arxiv.org/html/2411.10533v2

[9]Wang, Y., & Yu, R. (2025). Exploring the factors on the acceptance of generative artificial intelligence teaching assistants: The perspective of technology acceptance model.International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 794-808.

[10]Sun, Y., & Wu, Y. (2025). AI-powered scaffolding in EFL acquisition: Integrating TAM and CLT.Frontiers in Psychology.

[11]Shalevska, E., & Kostadinovska-Stojchevska, B. (2025). Enhancing vocabulary acquisition through NLP: A case study of sustainability-related lexis.UKLO Proceedings, 1(1).

[12]Xodabande, I., & Shirii, S. (2025). Exploring the impacts of an AI-driven instructional intervention on Iranian EFL learners' pronunciation skill development.Discover Education, 4, 11.

[13]Manna, M., Eradze, M., & Cominetti, F. (2025). How inclusive large language models can be? The curious case of pragmatics.Frontiers in Education, 10.

[14]Fan, Y., & Yao, X. (2025). Impact of AI-generated storytelling vs. gamified learning on vocabulary retention and engagement in CALL environments.Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.

[15]Choi, S. (2025). Ethical issues of using AI in language education: A critical perspective.English Teaching, 80(5), 229-248.