Institutional Issues and Enhancement of Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings in China: With Reference to the Australian Model Law Framework

Huainan Niu

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/2026.32797

Article Information

Received: 24 March 2026

Published: 13 April 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2026.32797

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Niu,H. (2026). Institutional Issues and Enhancement of Recognition of Foreign Insolvency Proceedings in China: With Reference to the Australian Model Law Framework. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,131,62-71.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Volume

Volume Title: LNEP Vol.131

Part of Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

ISSN: 2753-7048 (Print) / 2753-7056 (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]Zhang, H. and Huang, Y. (2023) Cross-Border Insolvency Law of China: An Empirical Analysis and Proposal Based on the Insolvency Cooperation Mechanism Between the Chinese Mainland and Hong Kong. International Insolvency Review, 32, 336-357.

[2]Guo, S. (2022) China. In: Recognition of Foreign Bank Resolution Actions. Edward Elgar Publishing, 103-124.

[3]UNCITRAL (1997) UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.

[4]Mevorach, I. (2023) Insolvency Standards, Model Laws, and Cooperation in Cross-Border Insolvency: The Role and Impact of UNCITRAL's Instruments. In: The Elgar Companion to UNCITRAL. Edward Elgar Publishing, 410-427.

[5]Bork, R. (2023) Introduction. In: Advanced Introduction to Cross-Border Insolvency Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 1-28.

[6]Symes, C. (2024) Sharing Australia's Cross-Border Insolvency Experiences Using the Model Law with the Arab World. In: International Trade with the Middle East and North Africa: Legal, Commercial, and Investment Perspectives. Routledge, 155-169.

[7]Bork, R. (2023) Recognition. In: Advanced Introduction to Cross-Border Insolvency Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 69-87.

[8]Bork, R. (2023) Cooperation and Coordination. In: Advanced Introduction to Cross-Border Insolvency Law. Edward Elgar Publishing, 86-93.

[9]Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of the People's Republic of China (2006).

[10]Guo, S. and Su, J. (2023) Chinese Cross-Border Insolvency Laws: Recent Developments and International Implications. International Insolvency Review, 32, 41-59.

[11]Wee, M.S. (2022) A Major Step in Developing Mainland China's Cross-Border Insolvency Law. International Insolvency Review, 31, 101-128.

[12]Lee, E. (2022) The Cooperation Mechanism and Legal Harmonisation: Analysing the Past, Present and Future of Mutual Recognition and Assistance in Insolvency Proceedings Across Mainland China and Hong Kong, with Insights from EU Insolvency Regulations. Journal of Corporate Law Studies, 22, 971-1015.

[13]Shi, Q. and Zhang, H. (2025) New Development of Cross-Border Insolvency in the Chinese Mainland and Hong Kong: Criteria Review and Jurisdictional Issues. International Insolvency Review, 34, 759-792.

[14]Kirshner, J.A. and Chatard, Y. (2023) Cross-Border Insolvency under the UNCITRAL Model Laws and the European Insolvency Regulation. In: The Elgar Companion to UNCITRAL. Edward Elgar Publishing, 428-441.