The Legal Dilemma and Optimization Path of the Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in Litigation

Yuxuan Ma

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/66/2024MU0012

Article Information

Received: 30 August 2024

Published: 10 September 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/66/2024MU0012

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Ma,Y. (2024). The Legal Dilemma and Optimization Path of the Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in Litigation. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,66,61-67.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Volume

Volume Title: LNEP Vol.66

Part of Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

ISSN: 2753-7048 (Print) / 2753-7056 (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]Sheng, Y. Y. (2022). Research on the issue of jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (Doctoral dissertation, Gansu University of Political Science and Law).

[2]Iwanejko, M. (1966-1967). Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice: The Plea to the Admissibility. The Polish Yearbook of International Law, 164-182.

[3]Yi, C. (2017). Power, Jurisdiction and Admissibility: Reconceptualizing Procedural Legal Issues in the Interpretative Proceedings under Article 60 of the ICJ Statute. Journal of East Asia and International Law, 10(2), 511-512.

[4]Wang, J. (2017). Research on the issue of jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (Doctoral dissertation, Jilin University of Finance and Economics).

[5]Shi, C. (2022). Research on the application of the principle of consent of the parties in the International Court of Justice (Doctoral dissertation, Liaoning University).

[6]Fitzmaurice, G. (1986). The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice (Vol. II, pp. 438-439).

[7]Interhandel (Switzerland v. United States of America), Judgment of 21 March 1959, I.C.J. Reports 1959, p. 26.

[8]Border and Transborder Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Judgment of 20 December 1988, I.C.J. Reports 1988, p. 7.

[9]Certain Norwegian Loans (France v. Norway), Judgment of 6 July 1957, I.C.J. Reports 1957, pp. 45-94.

[10]Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2008, pp. 203-206; Rosenne, S. (1983). Procedure in the International Court: A Commentary on the 1978 Rules of the International Court of Justice (pp. 92-94). Boston: M. Nijhoff.

[11]Liu, T. Q. (2022). Research on preliminary objections in the judgments of the International Court of Justice (Doctoral dissertation, Hainan University).

[12]Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France), Judgment of 4 June 2008, I.C.J Reports 2008, p. 135-279.