The effectiveness of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) has declined significantly in recent decades, weakening its ability to address contemporary security challenges. This paper examines the underlying causes of this decline, with a particular emphasis on the Council's structural inflexibility and the escalation of geopolitical competition among the P5 member states. It explores the ways in which these factors have impeded timely and effective decision-making, resulting in impasse and protracted humanitarian crises, through a comparative analysis of the Kosovo crisis, the Syrian civil war, and the Ukrainian conflict. The study underscores the challenges presented by the evolving multipolar world, the detrimental consequences of the frequent and strategic use of the veto, and the UNSC's failure to reform its decision-making mechanisms and membership structure. Lastly, the study demonstrates the pressing necessity of targeted reforms to fortify the Council's adaptive capacity and re-establish its role in the preservation of global peace and security in an international system that is becoming increasingly fragmented.
Research Article
Open Access