The United Nations has deep roots in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, having evolved alongside its emergence and development. More than merely acting as an "external" mediator, it has become a key architect of the conflict's historical narrative, legal framework, and proposed two-state solution. This study examines its multifaceted challenges—including "power politics" (the U.S. routinely using veto power to protect Israel in the Security Council), "weak implementation of resolutions" (as seen with Resolution 242), and "bilateral confrontational stances"—all unfolding within this complex historical and institutional context. This study examines the United Nations’ mediation efforts in the prolonged Israeli-Palestinian conflict through a case-based analysis of its multiple challenges and response strategies. Utilizing case studies and textual analysis, it dissects relevant UN resolutions, declarations, and practical interventions. Key research questions include: Why has the UN struggled to effectively advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace process? What pathways could overcome these obstacles? The analysis unfolds in four parts: Part I traces the historical roots of the conflict, evaluates the UN's evolving role and challenges, and proposes solutions. This study concludes that the UN's difficulties stem from power politics, weak resolution enforcement, and opposing stances. Nevertheless, it remains indispensable by fostering international consensus, advancing the "two-state solution," and innovating peace mechanisms—serving as the cornerstone for achieving a just and lasting peace.
Research Article
Open Access