Research on Preconception Protection of Fetus in China: Reflections on Article 16 of the Civil Code

Yuqian Zhang; Wenxing Chen

doi:10.54254/2753-7048/35/20232092

Article Information

Received: 6 November 2023

Published: 3 January 2024

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/35/20232092

Article Type: Research Article

Cite this article

Zhang,Y.;Chen,W. (2024). Research on Preconception Protection of Fetus in China: Reflections on Article 16 of the Civil Code. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,35,164-173.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About this Volume

Volume Title: LNEP Vol.35

Part of Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media

ISSN: 2753-7048 (Print) / 2753-7056 (Online)

Copyright & License

[1]Communist Party of China Central Committee, State Council. (2023). Decision on optimizing fertility policies to promote long-term balanced population development. Health China Observer, 2023(02), 11-14.

[2]Lu, Z., Song, B., Gao, Q., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Huang, D., & Wang, A. (2022). Enhancing the quality of maternal and child safety services to protect women and children’s health: Interpretation of the “Maternal and Child Safety Action Enhancement Plan (2021-2025).” Chinese Journal of Maternal and Child Health, 13(05), 1-4.

[3]Von Bar, C. (2001). European Comparative Tort Law (Vol. 2). (M. Jiao, Trans.). Beijing: Law Press. Pages 82-83.

[4]Medicus, D. (2013). General Theory of German Civil Law (Vol. 1). (J. Shao, Trans.). Beijing: Law Press. Page 786.

[5]Wang, Z. (2013). Law of Personality Rights: Jurisprudence, Comparative Law, Case Studies. Beijing: Peking University Press. Page 50.

[6]Guan, Y. (2008). A study on infringement of fetal personal rights. Journal of Fuzhou University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 22(3), 74-77.

[7]Zhu, C. (2005). Several issues on infringement of fetal personal interests. Law Journal, (06), 83-85.

[8]Medicus, D. (2013). General Theory of German Civil Law (Vol. 1). (J. Shao, Trans.). Beijing: Law Press. Page 785.

[9]Liu, Z. (2012). Construction of the system of partial legal capacity. Legal Studies, (5), 121-135.

[10]Fu, C. (2013). Research on the regulatory model of nuclear safety legislation—based on the experience of Germany. Science and Technology Management Research, (17), 245-250.

[11]Medicus, D. (2013). General Theory of German Civil Law (Vol. 1). (J. Shao, Trans.). Beijing: Law Press. Page 786.

[12]Wang, Z. (2009). Legal Doctrine and Case Studies on Civil Law (Vol. 4). Beijing: Peking University Press. Page 188.

[13]Wang, Z. (2009). Legal Doctrine and Case Studies on Civil Law (Vol. 4). Beijing: Peking University Press. Page 189.

[14]Wang, Z. (2013). Law of Personality Rights: Jurisprudence, Comparative Law, Case Studies. Beijing: Peking University Press. Pages 48-49.

[15]Ma, J., & Yu, Y. (2005). Original Research on Civil Law. Beijing: Law Press.

[16]Wang, L. (2005). Research on the Law of Personality Rights. Beijing: China Renmin University Press. Page 338.

[17]Liu, Z. (2012). Construction of the system of partial legal capacity. Legal Studies, (5), 121-135.

[18]Wang, L. (2015). Law of Personality Rights (2nd ed.). Beijing: China Renmin University Press.

[19]Jiang, Y. (2005). Discussion on issues related to the protection of fetal health interests. Journal of Foshan Science and Technology Institute (Social Science Edition), 23(2), 67-69.

[20]Yang, L. (2015). Law of Personality Rights. Beijing: Law Press.

[21]Li, X., & Jiang, F. (2008). Legal issues on “wrongful birth.” Shandong Judicature, (05), 78-82.

[22]Man, H. (2017). Lawsuits on “wrongful life” and the protection of personality interests. Legal Studies, (2), 28-42.

[23]Fan, M. (2012). Ethical issues of induced abortion and mid-term pregnancy termination. Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, 28(9), 672-674.

[24]Zhang, L. (2007). The quasi-personal status of the fetus and the protection of its personality interests. Forum on Politics and Law; Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, 164-170.

[25]Wang, Z. (2009). Legal Doctrine and Case Studies on Civil Law (Vol. 4). Beijing: Peking University Press. Page 195.

[26]Bai, X. (2010). Substantive and procedural issues in the protection of fetal interests: Focusing on the legal capacity of the fetus and the capacity of the parties. Journal of Beijing University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 26(01), 70-74.

[27]Wang, Z. (2009). Legal Doctrine and Case Studies on Civil Law (Vol. 4). Beijing: Peking University Press. Page 194.